Honest comparison · kept current
Logistic IntelPanjiva

LIT vs Panjiva

Panjiva is an S&P Global enterprise product priced for Fortune 1000 sourcing teams. LIT is built for the people who actually run freight sales — forwarders, brokers, NVOCCs, and 3PLs — at a price they can put on a company card the same day they see the demo.

TL;DR

Panjiva (S&P Global) is an enterprise trade-data platform built for supply-chain analysts and Fortune-class sourcing teams. Logistic Intel is a self-serve freight-prospecting platform built for forwarders, brokers, NVOCCs, and 3PLs. Pick Panjiva when your job is global trade mapping across 30+ jurisdictions. Pick Logistic Intel when your job is finding U.S. importers on a lane, getting verified buyer contacts, and starting outbound this week.

Side-by-side

Where LIT and Panjiva differ.

Pricing & access (lead with this)
Pricing model
Published tiers, credit card
Quote-only, annual contract
Pricing
Published subscription tiers, self-serve
Enterprise contract, quote-only
Procurement cycle
Same-day activation
Enterprise procurement (MSA + InfoSec review)
Free trial
14-day self-serve, full product
Recorded demo + sales call
Implementation fee
$0
Typically billed separately
Trade data depth
U.S. import shipments
Daily, full U.S. customs feed
Daily from same CBP source
Global coverage
US-strong + 12 priority lanes
30+ countries
Entity resolution
Practical: matches contacts
Industry-leading ML graph
Refresh cadence (US)
Daily on tracked lanes
Daily
HS, vessel, container fields
All standard, exportable
All standard + analytical add-ons
GTM workflow (the wedge)
Built-in CRM
Command Center: stages, tasks, notes
Not included
Verified buyer contacts
Multiple verified contacts per importer, refreshed
Not the product
Outbound campaigns
Email + LinkedIn + call sequences
Not included
Account briefs
Pulse AI in 90 seconds
Manual analyst reports
Lane-shift triggers
Pulse Coach signals
Manual export to Excel
CRM sync
Native HubSpot + Salesforce
CSV / custom data pipeline
Onboarding & fit
Time to first prospect list
Under 10 minutes from signup
Post-onboarding, ~2 weeks
Self-serve docs
Public help center
Gated customer portal
Support model
In-app chat + Slack channel
Named CS rep, enterprise SLA
Buyer profile fit
Forwarder, broker, NVOCC, 3PL
Fortune 1000 sourcing analyst
Decision guide

When each tool wins.

When to choose LIT
  • You are a freight forwarder, broker, NVOCC, or 3PL running outbound into US importers
  • Your sales team needs contacts, CRM, and campaigns — not just data exports
  • You have an SMB or mid-market budget and need value in week one
  • You measure success in meetings booked and lanes won, not dashboards delivered
  • You want to put the tool on a company card today and skip the procurement cycle
When to choose Panjiva
  • You are a supply-chain analyst at a Fortune 1000 sourcing or risk group
  • Your job is global trade mapping — Brazil-Vietnam, intra-EU, India-Africa flows
  • You already run a separate sales stack and only need deeper analytical data
  • You have enterprise procurement, a six-figure data budget, and a named S&P Global rep
We're honest because every team's stack is different. If Panjiva fits better, use it.

We evaluated Panjiva at the start of the year but the procurement cycle and the price tag did not match what our outbound team actually needed. We moved to Logistic Intel, got verified buyer contacts on day one, and were running freight-prospecting cadences inside the first week.

Marcus, VP Sales · mid-market freight forwarder
FAQ

Common questions about LIT vs Panjiva

Switching from Panjiva?
Free migration. Full data import.

Our team handles the import — accounts, contacts, lists, sequences. You keep your existing contract until renewal.

Get Started

See LIT in action.

Book a 30-minute demo with the team. We'll show you the platform live with your accounts.